Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

'Step forward' in skin cancer fight

Written By Unknown on Senin, 31 Maret 2014 | 21.24

30 March 2014 Last updated at 18:01 By Helen Briggs BBC News

Scientists say they have taken a step forward in understanding why some people are at greater risk of skin cancer because of their family history.

A newly identified gene mutation causes some cases of melanoma, a type of skin cancer, says a UK team.

The discovery will pave the way for new screening methods, they report in Nature Genetics.

The risk of melanoma depends on several factors, including sun exposure, skin type and family history.

Every year in the UK, almost 12,000 people are diagnosed with melanoma.

Continue reading the main story

This is a step forward for people with a strong family history of melanoma, the most dangerous form of skin cancer"

End Quote Dr Safia Danovi, Cancer Research UK

About one in 20 people with melanoma have a well-established family history of the disease.

A team led by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Hinxton, UK, found that people with mutations in a certain gene were at extremely high risk of melanoma.

The mutations switch off a gene known as POT1, which protects against damage to packets of DNA, known as chromosomes.

Co-author Dr David Adams, from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, said the discovery should lead to the ability to find out who in a family was at risk, and who should be screened for skin cancer.

He told the BBC: "The mutations in this gene result in damage to the end of the chromosomes and chromosomal damage in general is linked to cancer formation - that's the pathway for it."

Early detection

A number of gene mutations have been identified as increasing the risk of melanoma, but others remain unknown.

Prof Tim Bishop, Director of the Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, said the finding increased understanding of why some families had a high incidence of melanoma.

"Since this gene has previously been identified as a target for the development of new drugs, in the future it may be possible that early detection will facilitate better management of this disease," he said.

The team found cancers such as leukaemia were common in these families, suggesting the gene may underlie other cancers and not just melanoma.

Dr Safia Danovi of Cancer Research UK said: "This is a step forward for people with a strong family history of melanoma, the most dangerous form of skin cancer.

"But it's important to remember that, for most of us, avoiding sunburn and sunbeds is the best way to reduce the risk of this disease."


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Altitude sickness 'two illnesses'

31 March 2014 Last updated at 01:10

Altitude sickness is two illnesses, according to Edinburgh scientists.

The condition, triggered by falling oxygen levels, causes mild sickness, headaches and life-threatening problems affecting the heart, lungs and brain.

Researchers at Edinburgh University said they had shown it is actually "at least two separate syndromes".

The scientists said climbers and skiers who suffer from the potentially deadly condition could be treated more effectively following the new insight.

Altitude sickness occurs at heights above 2,500 metres.

Using a computer analysis method for grouping genes together, researchers studied patterns of symptoms among people in high altitude areas in Bolivia and Kilimanjaro in Tanzania.

One group experienced disrupted sleep but minimal headache, while another group only reported headaches and little disruption to sleep.

Others meanwhile experienced a mixture of symptoms.

Sleep disturbance

For more than 20 years, the condition has been diagnosed using a symptom score called the Lake Louise consensus.

A score for each symptom, including headache, fatigue and sleep disturbance, is added up and a diagnosed reached.

The findings, which have been published in the PLOS ONE journal, will also be presented at an international altitude sickness meeting later this year.

Dr Ken Baillie, of The Roslin Institute at Edinburgh University, said: "For more than two decades we have thought of altitude sickness as a single disease.

"We have now shown that it is at least two separate syndromes that happen to occur in the same people at a similar time.

"Studying these syndromes in isolation will make it easier to understand the cause of each one, and to test new treatments."


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Nursing body faces Mid-Staffs censure

31 March 2014 Last updated at 01:23 By Dominic Hughes Health correspondent, BBC News

The Nursing and Midwifery Council is facing more criticism over its handling of disciplinary cases in a report by the Professional Standards Authority.

In particular, the report highlights failings over the handling of cases relating to the scandal-hit Mid-Staffordshire NHS Trust.

Investigations were poor, decision-making flawed and record-keeping lax, says the PSA.

The NMC is responsible for regulating 673,000 nurses and midwives in the UK.

It has previously been accused of failing to protect patients and has admitted "substantial failings" in the past - but says the latest report recognises the progress it has made.

The report by the PSA - the body that oversees health regulators - shows the Nursing and Midwifery Council is struggling to move on from its troubled past.

Continue reading the main story

The NMC is letting down those patients who have received substandard care from these incompetent care professionals"

End Quote Katherine Murphy Patients Association

A huge backlog of cases and long delays led to accusations that it was failing at every level.

'Ongoing weakness'

This latest report saw the PSA carry out an audit of 100 cases dealt with by the NMC's disciplinary committee.

The report acknowledged that there had been some improvements under a new management team at the NMC, but outlines a number of areas where the organisation is still failing.

The report adds that there is an ongoing weakness in the NMC's ability to identify for itself where improvements are needed.

The PSA said: "We were disappointed that the NMC's internal review (in July 2013) of its handling of cases that involved registrants employed by Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust did not identify a number of serious issues that we picked up in our audit."

The report also highlighted concerns over the use of voluntary removal, where a nurse or midwife facing a disciplinary hearing can apply to be removed from the register without a full public hearing.

"We identified concerns in all 21 of the cases we audited that were closed following the grant of applications for voluntary removal, and have urged the NMC's Council to ensure that our concerns about the NMC's procedures are addressed quickly."

'Letting down patients'

Chief executive and registrar of the NMC Jackie Smith said she was pleased the report highlighted the improvements made to the way the disciplinary process for nurses and midwives works.

"We know that there is still more we need to do," she said.

"However, it recognises the progress we have made and confirms the commitment we made to improving performance."

But Katherine Murphy, chief executive of the Patients Association, described the findings as "deeply worrying".

"Delays in processing hearing cases and seeking interim orders would result in incompetent staff continuing to provide poor care to patients.

"The NMC is letting down those patients who have received substandard care from these incompetent care professionals who are free to continue to practice.

"It is disgraceful to see that lessons are still not being learnt from the Francis Inquiry and serious issues relating to registrants from the Mid Staffordshire trust have not been picked up.

"The Regulator needs to address these fundamental issues now and act urgently to protect the public."

Campaigner Julie Bailey of Cure The NHS said it was time to accept that the NMC was "not fit for purpose"

"The public expect patients to be protected and this is another instance where the NMC have failed us.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Crossrail digs up Black Death victims

Written By Unknown on Minggu, 30 Maret 2014 | 21.24

30 March 2014 Last updated at 00:00 By James Morgan Science reporter, BBC News

Skeletons unearthed in London Crossrail excavations are Black Death victims from the great pandemic of the 14th Century, forensic tests indicate.

Their teeth contain DNA from the plague bacterium Yersinia pestis and their graves have been dated to 1348-50.

Records say thousands of Londoners perished and their corpses were dumped in a mass grave outside the City, but its exact location was a mystery.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

This discovery solves a 660-year-old mystery. It's a hugely important step forward"

End Quote Jay Carver Lead archaeologist, Crossrail

Archaeologists now believe it is under Charterhouse Square near the Barbican.

They plan to expand their search for victims across the square - guided by underground radar scans, which have picked up signs of many more graves.

Crossrail's lead archaeologist Jay Carver says the find "solves a 660-year-old mystery".

"This discovery is a hugely important step forward in documenting and understanding Europe's most devastating pandemic," he said.

"Further excavations will follow to see if - as we expect - we are coming across a much bigger mass burial trench."

Man enters pit

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Scientists enter the pit and examine the skeletons discovered

Between 1347 and 1351 the "Great Pestilence" swept westward across Europe killing millions of people. It later became known as the Black Death.

Continue reading the main story

The plague

  • The plague is one of the oldest identifiable diseases known to man
  • Plague is spread from one rodent to another by fleas, and to humans either by the bite of infected fleas or when handling infected hosts
  • Recent outbreaks have shown that plague may reappear in areas that have long been free of the disease
  • Plague can be treated with antibiotics such as streptomycin and tetracycline
  • Source: World Health Organization

It arrived on Britain's shores in 1348 and is believed to have wiped out up to 60% of the population at the time.

In London, two emergency burial grounds were dug outside the walls of the City. One has been found at East Smithfield, while the other is known to lie somewhere in Farringdon.

In March 2013, Crossrail engineers uncovered 25 skeletons in a 5.5m-wide shaft - alongside pottery dated to the mid-14th Century.

Samples from 12 of the corpses were taken for forensic analysis. In at least four cases, scientists found traces of the DNA of the Yersinia pestis, confirming they had contact with the plague prior to their death.

To pinpoint which historical plague outbreak the "Charterhouse 25" could have fallen victim to, the researchers used radio carbon dating.

They determined the burial ground was used in at least two distinct periods - the earliest within the Black Death in 1348-50, followed by a later outbreak in the 1430s.

In a bid to understand just how far the grave extends across the square, Crossrail approached the University of Keele to undertake a forensic geophysics survey - using ground-penetrating radar.

The initial scan detected signs of further burials across Charterhouse Square and also the foundations of a building - possibly a chapel.

"We will undertake further excavations in Charterhouse Square later this year to confirm some of the results," said Mr Carver.

The skeletons provide a rare opportunity to study the medieval population of London, according to osteologist Don Walker, of the Museum of London Archaeology.

He said: "We can start to answer questions like: where did they come from and what were their lives like?

"I'm amazed how much you can learn about a person who died more than 600 years ago."

Analysis of isotope levels in the skeletons' bones and teeth indicate that:

  • Many of the skeletons appear to suffer signs of malnutrition and 16% had rickets.
  • There is a high rate of back damage and strain indicating heavy manual labour.
  • The later skeletons from the 1400s had a high rate of upper body injury consistent with being involved in violent altercations.
  • 13 of the skeletons were male, three female, two children, the gender was undetermined in the other seven skeletons.
  • 40% grew up outside London, possibly as far north as Scotland - showing that 14th Century London attracted people from across Britain just as it does today.

Mr Carver said: "We can see from the people here that Londoners weren't living an easy life.

"The combination of a poor diet and generally a struggle means they were very susceptible to the plague at that time and that's possibly one of the explanations for why the Black Death was so devastating."

By sequencing the ancient bacterial DNA, researchers hope to understand how the plague has evolved and spread over the centuries.

Globally the infection still kills 2,000 people a year, including countries like Madagascar. Antibiotics are available, but if untreated the disease kills within four days.

Scientists hope to confirm whether the 14th Century strain was the grandmother of all plague that exists today.

The £14.8bn Crossrail project aims to establish a 118km-long (73-mile) high-speed rail link with 37 stations across London, and is due to open in 2018.

The excavations have already unearthed Roman skulls washed down a lost river, a Bronze-Age transport route, and the largest piece of amber ever found in the UK.

The latest announcement comes ahead of a Channel 4 documentary, Return of the Black Death: Secret History, on 6 April, which follows the Charterhouse Square discovery.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Nurse in court charged with murders

29 March 2014 Last updated at 13:53
Victorino Chua

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Victorino Chua was remanded in custody by magistrates in Manchester

A nurse has appeared in court charged with murdering three patients at Stepping Hill Hospital in Stockport in 2011.

Victorino Chua, 48, of Churchill Street, Heaton Norris, is also charged with 31 other offences including GBH and attempted poisoning.

He is accused of murdering patients Tracey Arden, 44, Arnold Lancaster, 71, and Alfred Derek Weaver, 83.

At Manchester Magistrates' Court, he confirmed his name, age and address.

Mr Chua was remanded in custody to appear at Manchester Crown Court on Tuesday.

He faces one count of causing grievous bodily harm with intent, 22 counts of attempting to cause grievous bodily harm with intent, seven counts of attempting to administer poison and one count of causing poison to be administered with intent.

'Public support'

Investigators have been examining the contamination of saline ampoules and bags between 1 June and 15 July 2011 at the hospital.

Mr Chua, who is originally from the Philippines, was first arrested in January 2012 and was later released on bail. He was re-arrested on Friday.

In a statement, Ann Barnes, chief executive of Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, said: "We are very much aware that at the centre of this complex and lengthy police investigation are the patients and their families affected by these events.

"Our thoughts have been with them throughout this time.

"We have always benefited from outstanding public support and confidence in our services and are pleased that this has never wavered."


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Dentists to be given defibrillators

30 March 2014 Last updated at 00:01

Defibrillators are to be installed in every Scottish NHS dental practice.

The £1m Scottish government scheme aims to boost the survival chances for people who have heart attacks.

The 970 defibrillators will also be mapped by ambulance staff so call handlers can direct people to the nearest one while patients wait for paramedics to arrive.

More than 1,500 Scots died in the community last year after suffering a cardiac arrest.

A defibrillator can be used by anyone to deliver an electric shock to the chest to restore a person's heart to a normal rhythm after a cardiac arrest.

'Every second counts'

Ministers said that currently, only 5% of people who have a heart attack in the community survive and every minute of delay cuts their chances.

Public Health Minister Michael Matheson said: "Every second counts when someone's heart goes into cardiac arrest and having access to a defibrillator can mean the difference between life and death.

"As these machines are becoming easier to use it is only right that the public have more access to its life-saving potential in any public place.

"There are almost 1,000 NHS dental practices in the centre of Scottish communities. By giving them this equipment we are providing 1,000 more chances to save a life.

"I believe that this investment will save many more lives."

The machines are expected to be in place by the end of August.

Any dental practice which has already bought a defibrillator will be compensated.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Smoking bans 'improve child health'

Written By Unknown on Jumat, 28 Maret 2014 | 21.25

28 March 2014 Last updated at 01:24

Laws banning smoking in public places have had a positive impact on child health, an international study in the Lancet suggests.

Researchers found a 10% reduction in premature births and severe childhood asthma attacks within a year of smoke-free laws being introduced.

A research team analysed 11 previous studies from North America and Europe.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said smoking bans benefitted adults and children.

'Clear evidence'

This is one of the first large studies to look at how anti-smoking laws in different countries and states are affecting the health of children living in those regions.

Laws that prohibit smoking in public places, such as bars, restaurants and workplaces, have already been shown to protect adults from the dangers of passive smoking.

In this study, researchers from the University of Edinburgh, Maastricht University, Hasselt University in Belgium, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital looked at more than 2.5 million births and almost 250,000 hospital attendances for asthma attacks in children.

Dr Jasper Been, lead study author from the Maastricht University Medical Centre in The Netherlands, said the research on children under 12 was revealing.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

Smoking during pregnancy has been shown to have adverse effects on foetal development and pregnant women need to be informed of the risks"

End Quote Prof Ronnie Lamont Royal Collge of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

"Our study provides clear evidence that smoking bans have considerable public health benefits for perinatal and child health, and provides strong support for WHO recommendations to create smoke-free public environments on a national level."

The study also found a 5% decline in children being born very small for their age after the introduction of smoke-free laws.

Co-author Professor Aziz Sheikh, of Brigham and Women's Hospital, in Boston, Massachusetts, and the University of Edinburgh, said there was potential to improve the health of more children.

"The many countries that are yet to enforce smoke-free legislation should in the light of these findings reconsider their positions on this important health policy question."

Previous research suggests that 40% of children worldwide are regularly exposed to second-hand smoke, which has been shown to be a cause of respiratory disease and a trigger for asthma attacks in children.

Recent European research also showed that passive smoking causes thickening of children's arteries which can increase the risk of heart attacks and strokes in later life.

Experts say children are particularly vulnerable to the negative effects of second-hand smoke because their lungs and immune systems are still developing.

At present, 16% of the world's population is covered by smoke-free laws.

Scotland introduced a ban on smoking in enclosed public places in 2006, and England in 2007.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

If the report is suggesting that environmental tobacco smoke is the only or principal cause of childhood asthma, that's ridiculous"

End Quote Simon Clark Smokers' group Forest

Commenting on the study, Professor Ronnie Lamont from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said the study provided further evidence that smoking bans had substantial health benefits for adults and children.

"Smoking during pregnancy has been shown to have adverse effects on foetal development and pregnant women need to be informed of the risks and should be offered advice and support to help them give up.

"It is important that healthcare professionals encourage women to lead a healthy lifestyle."

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said it supported recommendations for further implementation of smoke-free environments.

'Gross overreaction'

A Department of Health spokesman said it wanted to build on the smoking ban by making it illegal for adults to buy cigarettes for children and to smoke in cars carrying children.

"We are also stopping tobacco being sold from vending machines and increasing the tax on tobacco and banning displays," it said.

But Simon Clark, director of the smokers' group Forest, said children tended to be exposed to second-hand smoke in the home, "so workplace smoking bans would have little or no impact on children".

"If the report is suggesting that environmental tobacco smoke is the only or principal cause of childhood asthma, that's ridiculous," he said.

"In the UK the number of people suffering from asthma has tripled in the last 40 years. During that same period the number of people who smoke has halved and today relatively few children are exposed to tobacco smoke in confined spaces such as homes and cars."

Mr Clark added that calling for more countries to introduce comprehensive smoke-free legislation was "a gross overreaction".


21.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Deaf woman hears for first time

28 March 2014 Last updated at 11:31
Joanne Milne

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Watch the moment Joanne Milne hears for the first time

The moment a 39-year-old woman heard for the first time, thanks to cochlear implants, has been captured on video.

Joanne Milne burst into tears when she heard a nurse reading out the days of the week.

Ms Milne, from Gateshead, was born deaf and during her 20s she also began to lose her sight, due to the rare medical condition Usher syndrome.

She said she was delighted by the results of the "life-changing" procedure to fit implants.

'So happy'

Ms Milne said: "The switch-on was the most emotional and overwhelming experience of my life and I'm still in shock now.

"The first day everybody sounded robotic and I have to learn to recognise what these sounds are as I build a sound library in my brain.

Continue reading the main story
  • A surgically implanted electronic device that can improve hearing by stimulating the auditory nerve
  • Although an implant cannot restore hearing to normal it does give the sensation of sounds
  • Not suitable for all deaf people, and those considering the surgery have to undertake in-depth hearing, speech and language, educational and psychological assessments
  • The implant is surgically placed under the skin behind the ear, while externally there is a microphone, speech processor and transmitter

"Hearing things for the first time is so, so emotional, from the ping of a light switch to running water. I can't stop crying.

"I can already foresee how it's going to be life-changing and the implants will get better and better over time. I'm so so happy."

Ms Milne, who works for charity Sense, said she was now a lot more aware of things around her.

'Studio in floods'

She thanked the team at the Midlands Implant Centre at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, for the procedure, which was carried out last month.

As a result of the transformation, her friend Tremayne Crossley decided to make her a compilation of songs - selecting one track from each year of her life.

He then sent the compilation to BBC 6 Music radio presenter Lauren Laverne.

After the playlist was featured on the show this week, Ms Laverne tweeted: "Just watched a video of today's #Memory Tape recipient having her cochlear implant turned on and hearing for the first time. Studio in floods."


21.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Eleven patients' deaths investigated

28 March 2014 Last updated at 12:38

The deaths of five babies are among 11 under investigation at the Northern Health Trust.

The health minister told the Northern Ireland Assembly that he had been made aware of 20 cases in which the trust's response was said to be below standard.

The patients were seen in the emergency, obstetrics, gynaecology or X ray departments.

It is not clear whether the deaths were avoidable. Edwin Poots said the trust's response should have been better.

He said this was especially true, where cases were not identified as "serious adverse incidents".

It is understood the babies were either born prematurely or were less than a month old.

The trust is also completing a review of about 35,000 X rays taken at the Causeway Hospital, Coleraine, County Londonderry, between 2011 and 2012.

Nine patients have been recalled. That review is now being extended across the entire health trust, involving 48,000 X rays.

Turnaround team

Health Minister Edwin Poots said the cases, which date from 2008 until the present, were discovered by a "turnaround team" he had sent to the trust.

"I wasn't happy with the Northern Trust, I wasn't happy with the way things were being done there and that's why I put a turnaround team in," he said.

"We do need to offset that with the fact that the Northern Trust was dealing with tens of thousands of cases.

"The Northern Trust is in a considerably better place than when I inherited it in 2011."

Mr Poots said Northern Ireland's hospitals "are safe places", but added: "Do we run perfect hospitals? We don't."

Maeve McLaughlin, the chair of the assembly's health committee, said the the news of the cases was "quite alarming".

"I think there are very serious questions [to answer]," she said.


21.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Child mental health issues 'missed'

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 25 Maret 2014 | 21.24

25 March 2014 Last updated at 02:38

Thousands of young people may be "slipping through the net" because adults do not spot the warning signs of mental health problems, experts warn.

MindEd, a new website, backed by groups including the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, is being launched to raise awareness.

A survey of 2,100 adults found a third were unsure of signs of depression in children.

More than 850,000 children in the UK have a mental health problem.

The survey, carried out on behalf of the child and adolescent mental health groups behind MindEd, also found half of those questioned would be worried about saying anything if they did suspect there was a problem, for fear of being mistaken.

Continue reading the main story
  • Loss of appetite or weight loss
  • Waking early
  • Excessive boredom
  • Poor concentration

Two-thirds would back extra government investment in children's mental health services to equip professionals with the skills to identify and treat these children earlier.

'Still a stigma'

Writing in a Scrubbing Up for the BBC News website, Dr Raphael Kelvin, child psychiatrist and clinical lead for the MindEd programme, said the survey also looked at other ways of helping children.

"When we polled the public on the issue, 69% said they supported the notion that every school should have a dedicated member of staff on site for children to approach about mental health and well-being issues."

The MindEd website, funded by the Department of Health, is aimed at helping adults who work with children, including teachers, sports coaches and social workers, to spot the signs of a potential problem.

Dr Kelvin added: "Half of all diagnosable mental health conditions start before the age of 14 and 75% by the age of 21, so identifying children at the earliest opportunity is crucial in setting them on the best path in life.

"Investing in early intervention is crucial - not doing so comes at a high price for those battling a mental health condition, and also costs the economy vast sums of money in lost education, training, jobs, and often, through crime."

'Not confident'

He said: "It's clear from these results that there's still stigma attached to mental health with 51% of adults admitting fear of approaching the issue.

"It's also clear that many adults are not confident in being able to spot the signs of ill mental health in children and many are turning to other adults - family, friends and teachers - for help and advice.

"So it's vital that people know what to look out for so they can address the issue before it worsens and that's where MindEd can help."

Care Minister Norman Lamb said: "Spotting the signs of mental health problems early in children and young people is essential to prevent problems from escalating and continuing into adulthood.

"That's why we have invested £3m in MindEd - so that people working with children, from teachers to dinner ladies and sports coaches to Scouts leaders, can recognise when a child needs help and make sure they get it."


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Air pollution 'killed seven million'

25 March 2014 Last updated at 10:43 By Helen Briggs BBC News
Commuters wearing masks

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

On some days you need a gas mask to go outside due to smog in Beijing

Seven million people died as a result of air pollution in 2012, the World Health Organization estimates.

Its findings suggest a link between air pollution and heart disease, respiratory problems and cancer.

One in eight global deaths were linked with air pollution, making it "the world's largest single environmental health risk", the WHO said.

Nearly six million of the deaths had been in South East Asia and the WHO's Western Pacific region, it found.

Continue reading the main story

The evidence signals the need for concerted action to clean up the air we all breathe"

End Quote Dr Maria Neira WHO

The WHO said about 3.3 million people had died as a result of indoor air pollution and 2.6 million deaths were related to outdoor air pollution, mainly in low- and middle-income countries in those regions.

'Heavy price'

WHO public health, environmental and social determinants of health department director Dr Maria Neira said: "The risks from air pollution are now far greater than previously thought or understood, particularly for heart disease and strokes.

"Few risks have a greater impact on global health today than air pollution.

"The evidence signals the need for concerted action to clean up the air we all breathe."

Reducing air pollution could save millions of lives, said the WHO.

WHO family, woman and children's health assistant director-general Dr Flavia Bustreo said: "Cleaning up the air we breathe prevents non-communicable diseases as well as reduces disease risks among women and vulnerable groups, including children and the elderly.

"Poor women and children pay a heavy price from indoor air pollution since they spend more time at home breathing in smoke and soot from leaky coal and wood cook stoves."

'Robust and accurate'

The WHO assessment found the majority of air pollution deaths were linked with cardiovascular diseases.

For deaths related to outdoor pollution, it found:

  • 11% - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • 3% - acute lower respiratory infections in children

For deaths related to indoor pollution, it found:

  • 12% - acute lower respiratory infections in children

University of Birmingham professor of environmental and respiratory medicine Jon Ayres said the review needed to be taken seriously.

"The estimates for the impact of outdoor air pollution are robust and as accurate as can be developed at the moment," he said.

The WHO estimates were based on:

  • satellite data
  • ground-level monitoring
  • modelling how pollution drifts in the air
  • pollution-emissions data

21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Mass water supply fluoridation urged

25 March 2014 Last updated at 11:08 By Nick Triggle Health correspondent, BBC News

Adding fluoride to water should be considered by councils in England to improve dental health, the government's public health advisory body says.

Public Health England urged councils to act after reviewing the impact of water fluoridation on children in areas where it has been introduced.

About 6m people - 10% of the country - currently live in areas with fluoridated water supplies.

PHE said it was a "safe and effective" public health measure.

Its review found it had reduced tooth decay and hospital admissions for dental problems.

In fluoridated areas, there were 45% fewer children aged one to four admitted to hospital.

Continue reading the main story

Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral found in water in varying amounts. It is also present in certain foods, such as fish and tea.

In the early 20th century, lower levels of tooth decay were found to be associated with certain fluoride levels in drinking water - it is thought to toughen the surface of the teeth.

This discovery lead to fluoride being added to toothpastes and the introduction of fluoridation schemes.

The first major scheme was in Birmingham in 1964. Since then parts of the north west, north east and Yorkshire and the Humber have followed suit as have large swathes of the Midlands.

Some areas - mainly the east coast - have naturally occurring high levels of fluoride in water.

Levels of general tooth decay were 15% lower for five-year-olds and 11% lower for 12-year-olds.

In deprived areas the impact for general tooth decay was even greater.

PHE also looked for signs of harms but found none. It has been suggested water fluoridation can increase the risk of some cancers, hip fractures and Downs syndrome.

Controversial

Sue Gregory, PHE's director of dental public health, said: "These findings highlight the important contribution that water fluoridation makes."

She said councils would need to consult their local populations on the issue and conceded there were some technical hurdles to overcome.

Water zones tend to span several local authority areas and so fluoridation could require agreement across regions.

England is one of the few countries in Europe that adds fluoride to water, although it is a more popular measures in places such as Australia and the US.

Birmingham was the first place to fluoridate water in the 1960s and since then other areas across the Midlands and in the north west, north east and Yorkshire and the Humber, have taken the step.

But it has proved controversial.

Attempts to add fluoride to the water supply in Hampshire in recent years have run into stiff opposition and even ended up in court with campaigners saying they were concerned about the health impacts.

But the health body proposing the scheme - the South Central Strategic Health Authority - was disbanded last year under the NHS reforms before it could enact the measure.

Prof John Ashton, of the UK Faculty of Public Health, which represents directors of public health working for local authorities, said he hoped the report would "address the concerns".

"Getting teeth in contact with fluoride is an essential component of good oral health, and water fluoridation is the most effective and cost effective method of achieving it."

But a spokesman for the National Pure Water Association said health chiefs should concentrate on alternatives, such as better dental hygiene, to improve teeth.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Active mums 'have active children'

Written By Unknown on Senin, 24 Maret 2014 | 21.24

24 March 2014 Last updated at 06:02

The more active a mother is, the more physically active her child will be, suggests a UK study of 500 mums and four-year-olds.

But many mothers' exercise levels fell way below recommended levels, it said.

Researchers from Cambridge and Southampton universities used heart-rate monitors to measure activity levels over seven days.

The study, published in Pediatrics, said policies to improve children's health should be aimed at mothers.

Children are not "just naturally active", it concluded, and parents have an important role to play in developing healthy exercise habits early on in life.

Run around

As part of the study, 554 four-year-olds and their mothers from Southampton wore a lightweight combined heart-rate monitor and accelerometer on their chests, for up to seven days.

Continue reading the main story

There are many competing priorities for new parents and making time to be active may not always be top of the list. "

End Quote Kathryn Hesketh Institute of Child Health, UCL

Participants wore it continuously, including while sleeping and doing water-based activities.

Kathryn Hesketh, now a research associate at the Institute of Child Health at University College London, co-led the study and said the data from mothers and children showed a direct, positive association between physical activity in children and their mothers.

"The more activity a mother did, the more active her child. Although it is not possible to tell from this study whether active children were making their mothers run around after them, it is likely that activity in one of the pair influences activity in the other."

She said that for every minute of moderate-to-vigorous activity a mother engaged in, her child was more likely to engage in 10% more of the same level of activity.

So if a mother spends one hour being more active per day, her child may spend 10 minutes being more active per day.

These small differences may seem trivial but over the course of a month or a year they could be significant, she added.

Factors which influenced a mother's activity levels included whether she worked or not and whether the child had brothers or sisters.

Co-study author Dr Esther van Sluijs, from the Centre for Diet and Activity Research at the University of Cambridge, said the link between a mother and child's activity levels was stronger for mothers who left school at 16, compared to those who left at 18.

Changes in motherhood

The study recognised that once women become mothers their activity levels fell and often failed to return to previous levels.

This lack of activity could then influence their young children, it said.

Miss Hesketh said: "There are many competing priorities for new parents and making time to be active may not always be top of the list. However, small increases in maternal activity levels may lead to benefits for mothers and children."

Simply walking and moving more each day can be all it takes to create these benefits.

Dr Ann Hoskins, director of children, young people and families at Public Health England, said it was committed to increasing physical activity in families and children to improve overall health.

"Active play is an important way to develop coordination and motor function skills in the pre-school early years and there are lots of activities like parent and toddler swims, buggy fit and baby gym which provide opportunities for mums to socialise, be active and support their child's development."

Their Change4Life campaign encourages families to eat well, move more and live longer. For children, that means being active for an hour a day and two and a half hours a week for adults.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fraud 'costing NHS £5bn a year'

24 March 2014 Last updated at 11:07

Fraud is costing the NHS £5bn a year, with a further £2bn lost to financial errors, the former head of its anti-fraud section says.

The amount lost to fraud alone could pay for nearly 250,000 new nurses, a report seen by Panorama suggests.

The NHS must "get on with tackling the problem", said Jim Gee, co-author of the Portsmouth University study and ex-director of NHS Counter Fraud Services.

The Department of Health said it "did not recognise" the figures.

The amount estimated by Mr Gee, who led the NHS anti-fraud section for eight years until 2006, is 20 times that recorded in the government's annual fraud indicator report.

It is based on worldwide figures, which suggest average losses to fraud and error of just under 7% of healthcare budgets.

"If the NHS is in line with the rest of the world it is losing £7bn," Mr Gee, who is currently Director of Counter Fraud Services at BDO LLP, told BBC Breakfast.

He said the UK-wide figures had to be extrapolated because "the NHS in recent years has stopped measuring its own losses" - only looking at those for dental and pharmaceutical services.

Jim Gee

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Jim Gee, report co-author, explains how the figures in his report were calculated

Key types of fraud include the non-payment of prescription charges by patients, medical professionals claiming for work they have not done and overcharging by contractors, said Mr Gee.

"We need to not be embarrassed, or in denial, about the possibility of fraud taking place in the NHS," he told Panorama.

"We need to get on with tackling the problem, minimising its cost, maximising resources available for proper patient care."

'Absolute sense'

The £2bn cost of errors relate to when the NHS makes overpayments by mistake to suppliers or staff.

Continue reading the main story

By its very nature, it is difficult to say just how much the NHS loses to fraud. Last year NHS Protect with its local investigators oversaw nearly 150 successful criminal cases. There were also 435 civil or internal disciplinary actions. But this is likely to be the tip of the iceberg.

Just like the Crown Prosecution Service, NHS Protect only proceeds with the cases it has a reasonable chance of winning - and cuts to its budget has made it even more difficult to gather evidence than it used to be.

It does not publish details of the amount of fraud that is brought to its attention nor the amount it suspects is happening. That is why the estimates by its previous director, Jim Gee, are very interesting.

The opportunity for fraud in a service as complex as the NHS where there are one million patient contacts every 36 hours is endless. There have been cases of dentists making claims for non-existent patients, GPs falsifying records to claim extra payments and consultants putting in for bogus overtime. Fraudsters outside the NHS have also targeted the service.

But if the £5bn figure is right, it suggests the problem is greater than anyone probably ever thought.

Although the NHS has a budget of about £100bn, it is having to make significant savings and should prioritise fighting fraud, said Mr Gee.

"I think fraud is one of the last great unreduced healthcare costs. And to me, putting money into it makes absolute sense," he said.

"It's one of the least painful ways of cutting costs. It makes absolute sense to cut the cost of fraud before you cut the quality, or extent of patient services."

The Department of Health declined to be interviewed but in a statement said "it did not recognise" the figure or "speculate on levels of losses".

Panorama also found that NHS Protect, the national body that investigates fraud in England for the Department of Health, has had its budget cut by around 30% since 2006.

The operating budget for NHS Protect in 2013-14 is £11.38m, the equivalent budget in 2006-07 was £16.29 million.

NHS Protect has replaced NHS Counter Fraud Services in England.

A Freedom of Information request by the BBC shows that NHS Protect employs 27 counter-fraud specialists, with a further 294 investigators working at a local level.

By contrast, the Department for Work and Pensions employs six times the number of investigators - but if Mr Gee's figures are accurate, they face less than half the amount of fraud.

The Department of Health said NHS Protect had a "significant budget" and "protects and safeguards frontline NHS services".

NHS anti-fraud teams investigate cases ranging from hundreds to millions of pounds.

Among their cases was that of dentist Joyce Trail, from Birmingham, who was one of the most prolific fraudsters in NHS history.

Continue reading the main story
  • Fiona Walker presents Panorama - The Great NHS Robbery
  • BBC One, Monday 24 March at 20:30 GMT

Trail charged the NHS for work she had never actually carried out.

She visited care homes offering to check residents' teeth and then used their personal details to claim payment from the NHS.

Trail even claimed payment for the false teeth for patients who had died.

She was jailed in 2012 for £1.4m worth of fraud.

Other fraudsters investigators have prosecuted include NHS employees selling stolen products on eBay and dentists charging the NHS for gold crowns while fitting patients with cheaper ones.

One investigator, Barry Hards, said the lack of money for investigators means that now is a good time to be a fraudster in the NHS.

"How can you have confidence that there's a likelihood you'll be found out, when there's very few people looking at you?" he said.

"I think it's a genuinely held concern that some people in senior positions have just taken their eye off the ball on this."


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Warning over burning aborted foetuses

24 March 2014 Last updated at 12:02

The medical director of the NHS is writing to all hospital trusts in England reminding them that it is illegal to dispose of aborted foetuses by burning them as clinical waste.

The move by Prof Sir Bruce Keogh comes after it emerged that some hospitals have been doing it, even though the practice is banned.

Channel 4 Dispatches programme says 10 NHS trusts have been burning remains alongside rubbish.

Two more disposed of bodies in incinerators used to heat hospitals, it claims.

Health minister Dr Dan Poulter said this practice was "totally unacceptable".

"That is why I have asked Professor Sir Bruce Keogh, NHS medical director, to write to all NHS hospital trusts, to make it clear that it must stop now.

Continue reading the main story

I am disappointed trusts may not be informing or consulting women and their families"

End Quote Professor Mike Richards Care Quality Commission

"The chief medical officer has also written to the Human Tissue Authority to ask them to make sure that there is clear guidance on this issue.

"While the vast majority of hospitals are acting in the appropriate way, that must be the case for all hospitals and the Human Tissue Authority has now been asked to ensure that it acts on this issue without delay."

'Disappointed'

The HTA has a code of practice for the disposal of human tissue, which includes foetal remains, that hospitals should follow.

It says women who have had an abortion or miscarriage should be informed that there are different options available - burial, cremation and incineration.

It says disposal via incineration should be handled as "sensitive" and therefore should not be done alongside the burning of waste.

In his letter, Prof Keogh says: "While it is acknowledged that incineration is not illegal across the UK, existing professional guidance makes clear that the practice is inappropriate.

"I share the view that incineration of fetal remains is inappropriate practice and that other methods offer more dignity in these sensitive situations."

The Dispatches programme claims some women were not told that their aborted foetus would be incinerated as waste.

Professor Sir Mike Richards, chief inspector of hospitals, from the Care Quality Commission, said: "I am disappointed trusts may not be informing or consulting women and their families. This breaches our standard on respecting and involving people who use services and I'm keen for Dispatches to share their evidence with us.

"We scrutinise information of concern and can inspect unannounced, if required."

Sands, the stillbirth and neonatal death charity, said the practice of incinerating pre-24 week foetuses is unacceptable and that whenever possible, cremation should be used instead.

A spokesperson said: "Research has shown that the stage the pregnancy has reached when the baby dies is not an accurate predictor of the length and depth of the grief the parents will experience.

"Foetus is not a term that parents use or that should be used with them. From the day the pregnancy is confirmed they are expecting a baby.

"The death of a baby at any stage of pregnancy is a major bereavement with life long consequences.

"The care that parents receive cannot lessen their pain, but poor and insensitive care can and does make matters worse both in the short and the long term."

In 2011, 189,931 abortions were carried out in England and Wales, mostly on the NHS.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Call for change to breast screening

Written By Unknown on Sabtu, 22 Maret 2014 | 21.24

22 March 2014 Last updated at 01:09 By Pippa Stephens Health reporter, BBC News

Almost one-third of women are at a higher risk of developing breast cancer and should be screened more than once every three years, a study says.

The study analysed 53,467 women between 2009 and 2013.

Scientists found 14,593 women had an "above average" risk of developing breast cancer.

They hope the study will help prevent cases of breast cancer through women being more aware of their own risk and adopting certain lifestyle changes.

NHS cost-saving

An above average risk was defined in the study as a 3.5% chance of developing breast cancer in the next 10 years.

Women aged between 50 and 70 are currently offered a mammogram once every three years, to help identify cancer early, so treatment has a better chance of working.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

This would put women's destiny in their own hands"

End Quote Prof Gareth Evans University of Manchester

Lead researcher Prof Gareth Evans, at the University of Manchester, said greater prevention would not only save more women the "awful" actuality of being diagnosed, but would also save the NHS an "enormous amount of money".

Scientists assessed a patient's likelihood of developing breast cancer through questionnaires assessing risk factors, such as family history and lifestyle, and collected genetic information from saliva.

A new approach?

They also measured breast tissue density, which is an indicator of a patient's susceptibility to breast cancer, using mammograms and a visual assessment.

Prof Evans said in an "ideal world", women could fill in an online questionnaire documenting their risk factors and then have their breast tissue density analysed by a mammogram.

He said those at a greater risk could have more regular screening, to detect cancer early and stop it spreading.

Certain lifestyle changes could also be adopted, such as exercising, which he said decreases risk by 30%, not putting on weight, or losing weight, and reducing alcohol intake.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

Would more regular screening lead to a rapid decrease in risk or would it take some time?"

End Quote Prof Michael Marmot University College London

Prof Evans added: "This would put women's destiny into their own hands."

Trial needed?

Since an independent review into the effectiveness of breast cancer screening was published in 2012, there has been much debate around the concept of "over-diagnosis".

Over-diagnosis happens when screening correctly identifies a tumour but one that would never have caused harm.

It means women undergo treatment which could be unnecessary, such as surgery, hormone therapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and may suffer often considerable side-effects.

Prof Michael Marmot, from University College London, said the study could help with this issue.

He said women at a high risk of developing breast cancer would be more likely to show signs of a serious form of the disease, so the treatment could be more relevant.

But he said a trial was now needed to see assess the significance of missing one or two years of screening in a cancer's development.

NHS programme

He said: "Would more regular screening lead to a rapid decrease in risk or would it take some time?"

Prof Evans said he will now be approaching the NHS to try to secure funding for a new approach.

A spokeswoman for the NHS Cancer Screening Programmes said if "evidence changed", in relation to a change of approach, they were "sure that would be a step that would be looked at".

The organisation had now expanded to give women at high risk more frequent screening, using information about their family history, which they had passed on to their doctors, the spokeswoman said.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fears over statins 'are misleading'

22 March 2014 Last updated at 11:26

A leading researcher on cholesterol-lowering statin drugs has accused critics of misleading the public about the dangers of taking them.

Prof Sir Rory Collins said two critical articles published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) were flawed.

But BMJ editor Dr Fiona Godlee said they were well researched.

The drugs are already offered to about seven million people in the UK who have a one-in-five chance of heart disease in the next decade.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) says the scope for offering this treatment should be widened to people with as low as a one in 10 or 10% risk to save more lives.

Its recommendation follows a study which was overseen by Professor Collins' team at Oxford University.

Prof Collins criticised articles in the BMJ by John Abramson from Harvard medical school, and Aseem Malhotra, a UK cardiologist, who both claimed statins caused harmful side effects and did not reduce mortality.

Continue reading the main story

The articles were well written, well referenced, they were peer reviewed"

End Quote Dr Fiona Godlee BMJ

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Statins are given to people at elevated risk of heart attacks and strokes - if people at elevated risk stop taking their statins or don't start taking their statins then they will have unnecessary heart attacks and strokes, there will be unnecessary deaths from vascular causes. This is really irresponsible journalism."

He said the studies' claims, that about 20% of people suffer disabling side affects due to statins, was not supported by the original research referenced by the papers published by the BMJ.

Research 'not released'

He told the Guardian that the reporting was creating a situation which had echoes of the MMR vaccine controversy.

"It is a serious disservice to British and international medicine," he said.

But the BMJ's editor, Dr Fiona Godlee, defended the articles, saying some research understated the risks of side-effects.

"The randomised control trial data is notoriously poor at reporting adverse events. So I think it's extremely important that the public understand when we're talking about extending statins to people at low risk, that the balance between benefits and harms becomes much more important," she said.

She added: "The articles were well written, well referenced, they were peer reviewed."

Dr Godlee also criticised the fact that the individual patient data of Prof Collins' research had not been released. "It's no longer sufficient to make widespread extension of drug treatments on the basis of data that is not widely available for scrutiny," she said.

Currently, doctors are supposed to offer statin tablets to the estimated seven million people who have a 20% chance of developing cardiovascular disease over 10 years, based on risk factors such as their age, sex, whether they smoke and what they weigh.

Doctors will need to "make a judgement" about the risks to people who have a less than 10% risk of developing cardiovascular disease and advise them appropriately, say the draft guidelines.

The NHS currently spends about £450m a year on statins. If the draft recommendations go ahead, this bill will increase substantially, although the drugs have become significantly cheaper over the years.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Doctors 'outraged' at NHS pay deal

22 March 2014 Last updated at 12:32

Doctors feel a "deep sense of outrage" at the failure to grant them a 1% increase in basic pay, the head of the British Medical Association has said.

In a letter to Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt, Dr Mark Porter urged the government to reconsider the decision.

Many NHS staff will get a 1% rise, but those receiving automatic "progression-in-job" increases, "typically worth over 3%", will not get the 1% as well.

The government said a 1% across-the-board rise would cost jobs.

The Consumer Prices Index (CPI) measure of inflation is currently at 2%, and the NHS pay review body had recommended that all NHS staff should get a 1% pay rise - whether they were also entitled to progression pay increases or not.

'Misplaced'

In the letter, Dr Porter said it was "frustrating" that Mr Hunt had chosen to ignore that recommendation.

"Your deliberate conflation of pay progression and cost-of-living uplift is particularly misplaced," he wrote.

Continue reading the main story
  • Senior managers' average pay is £78,513
  • Doctors' average earnings: £74,167
  • Managers' average earnings £49,475
  • Nurses' and midwives' average earnings is £30,854
  • 55% of staff get incremental pay increases
  • 45% don't get incremental pay increases because they are at top of their pay band

"Leaving aside the fact that a 1% uplift would in no way keep pace with the increases in the cost of living, incremental pay progression is designed to address a very different set of issues.

"Pay progression is required to recognise learning and development in a role.

"Doctors gain more experience and responsibility over time and incremental progression arrangements for consultants, in particular, is a measure to control costs, building in a series of extended periods before they reach the full rate for the job."

The Unite union said last week that the pay decision was "the straw that breaks the camel's back" and its members now wanted to consider industrial action.

Unison's national officer Christina McAnea said the government had shown "complete contempt" for NHS staff, who were "on average, 10% worse off than when the coalition came to power".

But a Department of Health spokesman said implementing the review body recommendation would cost £450m.

"That's the equivalent of 14,000 new nurses, and would put at risk the safe, compassionate care that we are committed to.

"The health secretary has made it clear that his door is open to agree alternative proposals on pay providing we can continue to protect the front line."

The Scottish government has said it will adopt the NHS pay review body's recommendations in full, meaning that all NHS staff in Scotland will receive the 1% pay rise.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

UK experts back meningitis B jab

Written By Unknown on Jumat, 21 Maret 2014 | 21.24

21 March 2014 Last updated at 10:40 By Caroline Parkinson Health editor, BBC News website

A vaccine that protects against a deadly form of meningitis is set to be introduced in the UK.

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), which has recommended the move to the government, had said last year that the jab was not cost-effective.

Meningitis charities said more data had led to today's decision, and it was a "wonderful outcome".

About 1,870 people contract meningitis B each year and one in 10 dies.

Continue reading the main story

Meningitis

  • Meningitis is an infection of the meninges - the membrane that surrounds the brain and spinal cord.
  • Meningococcal bacteria are common and carried harmlessly in the nose or throat by about 1 in 10 people.
  • They are passed on through close contact.
  • Anyone can get meningitis but babies and young children are most vulnerable.
  • Symptoms include a high fever with cold hands and feet, agitation, confusion, vomiting and headaches.

Babies under one year are most at risk of meningitis B, and the cases peak at around five or six months of age.

The bacterial infection causes inflammations of the brain and spinal cord.

It leaves one in four with life-altering effects, such as brain damage or limb loss.

The JCVI said the vaccine was effective in preventing meningitis B and should be rolled out subject to it being made available by the manufacturer "at a cost effective price".

It has recommended the jab be added to the existing immunisation schedule, starting at two months of age.

Around 700,000 infants will be eligible for vaccination each year.

'First in the world'

There are vaccines against other forms of meningitis but the Bexsero jab, developed by Novartis, is the only one thought to protect against meningitis B.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

It's a wonderful outcome which will save lives and spare countless families the trauma of seeing a loved one seriously disabled by the devastating after effects of MenB"

End Quote Christopher Head, Meningitis Research Foundation

Tests have suggested the vaccine is effective against 73% of the different strains of the disease. It was licensed for use in Europe in January 2013.

The JCVI considered the introduction of the meningitis B vaccine last summer but in an interim judgement, it ruled it would not be cost-effective to introduce it.

At the time, campaigners called the decision a "severe blow" and urged the committee to look at the issue again.

More evidence has since been submitted, and the government will now begin negotiations with Novartis over the cost of the vaccine.

Prof Andrew Pollard, chairman of the JCVI and professor of paediatric infection and immunity at the University of Oxford said: "MenB disproportionately affects babies and young children and can be devastating.

'Complex and brave decision'

"After very careful consideration, JCVI concluded that use of the new vaccine would reduce cases of meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia and lead to a reduction in deaths, limb amputations and brain injury caused by the disease.

Continue reading the main story

CURRENT CHILDHOOD VACCINATIONS

  • 2 months - '5 in 1' - diptheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib); pneumococcal (PCV); rotavirus
  • 3 months - 5 in 1 (second dose); meningitis C; rotavirus (second dose)
  • 4 months - 5 in 1 (third dose); PCV (second dose)
  • 12-13 months - Hib/Men C booster; MMR (measles, mumps, rubella); PCV (third dose)
  • 2 and 3 years - annual flu jabS
  • Around 3 years and 4 months - MMR (second dose); 4 in 1 - diptheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio
  • Source; NHS Choices

"Today the JCVI published its recommendation to the UK health departments that if the new vaccine can be purchased at a low price and is therefore cost effective for the NHS, it should be used in the routine immunisation programme for babies in the UK to prevent disease.

"Routine use of the MenB vaccine is expected to make an important contribution to the health of our population."

The deputy chief medical officer, Prof John Watson, said: "We will now be working closely with Novartis in the coming months and if negotiations are successful, we hope to work with the other UK health departments to introduce a vaccine to prevent MenB as quickly as possible.

"This would make the UK the first country in the world to implement a nationwide vaccination programme."

Adam Finn, a vaccine expert and professor of paediatrics at the University of Bristol, said: "This was a complex, difficult and brave decision with far reaching consequences not only for the control of meningococcal disease but also for future vaccine development against severe but rare infections."

Christopher Head, chief executive of Meningitis Research Foundation said: "We are delighted that the JCVI have recommended vaccinating all babies against this most feared and deadly disease.

"It's a wonderful outcome which will save lives and spare countless families the trauma of seeing a loved one seriously disabled by the devastating after effects of MenB."


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

'Ban junk food TV ads until 21:00'

21 March 2014 Last updated at 02:33

Children are being exposed to TV adverts promoting unhealthy food which should be banned during primetime family viewing, says a campaign group.

Action on Junk Food Marketing analysed 750 adverts shown during the X Factor on ITV and the Simpsons and Hollyoaks on Channel 4 over 20 hours.

It found one in 10 promoted fast food restaurants, confectionery or supermarket 'junk food'.

But the government said advertising was not to blame for childhood obesity.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

The UK's evidenced-based approach to the advertising rules works, balancing sensible protections with the freedom to advertise"

End Quote Ian Barber Advertising Association

The analysis, which was carried out by researchers at the University of Liverpool, found that unhealthy food items accounted for 11% of all adverts and around half of all food adverts.

They said the most frequently shown adverts for unhealthy food products came from supermarkets such as Aldi and Morrisons, followed by fast food chains such as Dominos and Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC).

Chocolate manufacturers like Lindt and Cadbury and brands such as Clover and Flora Buttery were also included on the "unhealthy" ads list.

The researchers looked at adverts shown during 10 hours of X Factor programmes and another 10 hours of early evening Channel 4 programmes during the run-up to Christmas 2013.

Peak viewing

The campaign group Action on Junk Food Marketing, whose members include the Children's Food Campaign and the British Heart Foundation, said children's TV viewing peaks around 20:00 but laws to protect children from targeted advertising only cover children's programmes, which tend to be broadcast earlier in the day.

Simon Gillespie, chief executive of the British Heart Foundation, said: "Parents don't expect their children to be bombarded with ads for unhealthy food during primetime TV, but that's exactly what happens.

"Even when the show is over, junk food marketers could be reaching out to young people online. A lack of regulation means companies are free to lure kids into playing games and entering competitions - all with a view to pushing their product."

Prof Mitch Blair, officer for health promotion at the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said advertising junk food during family-friendly programmes like the X Factor is known to work.

"Not only are children and young people easily influenced and parents worn down by pester power, but food companies wouldn't spend huge amounts of money if it wasn't effective."

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

We are all eating too many calories and too much salt, fat and sugar which impacts on our health"

End Quote Dr Alison Tedstone Public Health England

Campaigners want the ban on "junk food" advertising to be extended to 21:00.

"Children should not be commercially exploited and the advertising industry must take some responsibility for helping tackle the growing problem of childhood obesity," Prof Blair said.

Sensible rules

The government said advertising was just one aspect in determining children's choice of food and one part of the package aimed at tackling childhood obesity and poor diet. It added that it was keeping "this area under review".

The Advertising Association went further saying the report was "lobbying dressed up as science" and the current rules on advertising were working.

Communications director Ian Barber added: "The UK's evidenced-based approach to the advertising rules works, balancing sensible protections with the freedom to advertise, allowing companies to compete - to the benefit of us all - and providing important funding for free-to-air TV."

But there is general agreement that with around one-third of UK children now overweight or obese, encouraging families and children to eat healthier diets is important.

Dr Alison Tedstone, director of diet and obesity at Public Health England, said they were working with the food industry to promote healthier products on TV through their Change4Life campaign.

"We recognise that we are all influenced by food adverts on TV. We are all eating too many calories and too much salt, fat and sugar which impacts on our health, causing obesity which increases our risk of cardiovascular disease, type-2 diabetes, and some cancers."


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

UK 100-year-olds increase by 73%

21 March 2014 Last updated at 12:09 By Pippa Stephens Health reporter, BBC News

The number of people living in the UK aged 100 increased by 73% in the decade to 2012, said the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

In 2012 there were 13,350 centenarians living in Britain, from 7,740 in 2002.

The ONS also said life expectancy in Britain had "reached its highest level on record for both males and females".

A newborn boy could live 78.7 years, and a girl, 82.6 years, if mortality rates stayed the same for 2010 and 2012 in the UK, it said.

Meanwhile, a man aged 65 in the UK could expect to live for 18.2 years, a 40% increase in the 30 years to 2012, and a 65-year-old woman, for 20.7 years, a 25% increase.

The life expectancy gap between sexes had narrowed to four years, when it was measured between 2010 and 2012, from six years between 1980 and 1982, said the ONS.

'Country variation'

The latest ageing figures showed the changing nature of Britain's population, as the ONS reported more than half a million people aged 90 and over were living in the UK in 2012, a group the organisation calls the "very old".

There were 264 women for every 100 men aged over 90, it said.

Out of the 13,350 centenarians living in the UK in 2012, 660 were aged 105 years and older, while England and Wales had the most 100-year-olds.

The number of people aged 90 and over increased to 806 per 100,000 in 2012, compared to 305 per 100,000 in 1982.

Male life expectancy increased by two-and-a-half years every decade since 1980 to 1982, and two years for women over the same timeframe, the ONS said.

Internationally, the UK lagged only behind Spain, Italy, France and Japan for the number of 100-year-olds in its population.

In 2012, Japan had almost double the number of Britain's 21 centenarians per 100,000 of its population.

But the ONS said: "In comparison to many other countries, the UK has relatively high numbers of centenarians."

It said Western Europe had higher rates of centenarians than countries in Eastern Europe, with Russia having four per 100,000 of its population.

The ONS said this reflected Russia's "relatively low life expectancy".


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

NHS complaints system 'too complex'

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 20 Maret 2014 | 21.24

20 March 2014 Last updated at 00:47 Adam BrimelowBy Adam Brimelow Health Correspondent, BBC News

The complaints system for the NHS in England is "hopelessly complicated" and needs an overhaul, according to the patients' watchdog.

Healthwatch England says more than 70 organisations are involved in dealing with complaints about the NHS and social care.

It wants the process to be simplified to ensure patients get more support.

NHS England says it is committed to improving how complaints are handled and is piloting a new approach.

Several inquiries have highlighted failings in the complaints systems for health and social care, and the dangers of failing to heed patients' concerns.

Now Healthwatch England's review of the complaints system - based on public responses to its survey - has discovered there are up to 75 different types of organisation involved in the process.

Initially, health and care providers - including hospitals, GP practices and care homes - or their commissioning bodies can be challenged.

'Utterly bewildering'

Then there is a complex array of regulators, inspectorates, courts and committees that may get involved, meaning a single complaint can be passed between organisations.

Continue reading the main story

"It's no wonder the public are left confused and frustrated. With so many organisations involved it's difficult to know where to start, let alone having the strength and persistence to navigate the system on your own"

End Quote Anna Bradley Chairwoman, Healthwatch England

If a patient is concerned about an unsafe discharge from hospital, for example, the complaint process might begin with the hospital or clinical commissioning group, before being escalated to the health service ombudsman if it cannot be resolved locally.

Alternatively, if there is a problem caused by failings in the social care system, the complaint might involve the care home provider - possibly a private company - the local authority responsible for overseeing provision and the local government ombudsman.

In cases of possible clinical negligence, the issue could go before the General Medical Council or General Nursing Council and might end up before the courts.

Healthwatch England says for patients the process is "utterly bewildering", and it wants a system where people raise a concern or make a complaint just once.

The watchdog says problems are being compounded by a lack of consistent and easy access to complaints support services.

'Significant change'

Its chairwoman, Anna Bradley, said: "It's no wonder the public are left confused and frustrated. With so many organisations involved it's difficult to know where to start, let alone having the strength and persistence to navigate the system on your own.

"There will need to be very significant change in the complaints system if it is to benefit from the intelligence and insight that complaints can offer and use it to drive real improvement for the people actually using services."

Julie Mellor, Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman said: "We agree with Healthwatch that the current complaints system is too complex and we are working with the Department of Health, NHS England and regulators to help people better understand where they need to go when they want to raise a concern."

Jane Cummings, chief nursing officer for England, said: "Our single most important purpose is to look after patients with compassionate care. That means delivering the best possible patient experience to every single patient, every single time.

"As part of this we must listen, take seriously and respond promptly, responsibly and openly to any complaint we receive. Poor complaints handling is unacceptable."

She said NHS England was developing a new approach so that patients could have complaints resolved "simply and effectively", without having to negotiate a complex system.

'Take action'

The warning comes soon after a review of NHS complaints in Wales was launched.

Health minister Mark Drakeford launched the 12-week review of the NHS complaints handling process in February to establish "what needs to improve".

It is being held as the current system, Putting Things Right, is almost three years old, the minister said.

In Scotland, there was a 13% rise in complaints against the NHS in 2012/13 compared to 2011/12.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Girl died after paramedic 'failure'

20 March 2014 Last updated at 11:02

A paramedic failed to give basic treatment when he stopped trying to resuscitate a girl who died after an asthma attack, a coroner has said.

Seven-year-old Izabelle Easen died from a cardiac arrest at her home in Thorne, South Yorkshire, on 9 April 2008.

Paramedic James McKenna tried to revive her but pronounced her dead after no more than 11 minutes, an inquest heard.

Assistant coroner Michael Mellun said that was "a gross failure to provide basic medical treatment".

Children 'robust'

The paramedic was later struck off by the Health Professions Council which heard how ambulance service guidelines stated all children should be given life-saving treatment until they arrive at hospital.

Mr Mellun said he could not rule that the failures in the care of Izabelle, known as Bella, amounted to negligence because the chances she would have survived if she had been taken to hospital were so slim.

However, delivering a narrative verdict at a hearing in Doncaster on Wednesday, he said: "I am satisfied there was a gross failure to provide basic medical treatment."

Continue reading the main story

The verdict brings an end to a period of unimaginable pain and distress endured for far too long by those who loved Izabelle Easen"

End Quote Mary Ann Charles Family solicitor

Consultant chest specialist Simon Taggart said there was a 5% chance Bella could have survived if resuscitation had continued and she had reached hospital.

"If she has a 5% chance, that failing contributed to her death," he said. "I view it that children are robust and should be given every chance."

Mr McKenna told the inquest that he got the protocol wrong as he believed at the time that the requirement to always take young patients to hospital only related to babies.

But he said there were no signs of life in Bella and he believed that taking her to hospital would not have saved her.

The court heard that Bella had suffered from a severe form of asthma for about three years and had been admitted to hospital numerous times.

Mary Ann Charles, the family's solicitor, said: "The verdict brings an end to a period of unimaginable pain and distress endured for far too long by those who loved Izabelle Easen."

She said that Bella's mother, Lorna Robinson, spent years blaming herself for not doing enough for Bella.

"In fact she did everything she could," she said. "It was the health services which had failed her daughter."


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More

Patient feedback posts open to abuse

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 19 Maret 2014 | 21.24

18 March 2014 Last updated at 23:14 By Mike Deri Smith BBC Newsnight
NHS England's Director of Patient Experience Neil Churchill

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Neil Churchill, director of patient experience for NHS England: "The issue here is transparency"

The NHS has removed all but one of 653 patient reviews of a healthcare trust from its website, after BBC Newsnight found the system was open to abuse.

Newsnight found that last year, 49% of patient reviews - 105 of 216 - about Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust on NHS Choices had come from staff accounts.

Some 47% of those from staff accounts did not declare a conflict of interest.

Staff often help patients to post reviews, but the trust acknowledged it needed to be clearer who wrote them.

The reviews were originally posted to independent feedback website Patient Opinion, but syndicated to appear on the NHS Choices website.

Most of the reviews posted without staff declaring a conflict of interest were from staff accounts that had declared themselves on other occasions when posting on behalf of patients.

Any data that notes when a staff member has posted is automatically stripped out on NHS Choices.

'Open and honest'
Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

I have been let down by the service at every opportunity, when I was at my most desperate"

End Quote Anonymous online review

A spokesman for Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust said: "We acknowledge that postings need to be clearer about who is writing them and we are working on a solution for this, internally and with Patient Opinion.

"We have created a public website so that anyone can see what is being said about our services because we want to be open and honest about the feedback we receive."

Patient Opinion said it supported trusts to help people with mental health problems, learning difficulties, the elderly, or those without internet access to post reviews.

"We absolutely accept that it must be clear to everyone when a story has been added by staff, on behalf of a patient or carer. We have updated our site so that we can now show this correctly for past and future stories."

However, it added that it had no reason to doubt the legitimacy of reviews posted by staff.

'Seriously let down'

The single review left on NHS Choices about the trust, which was not syndicated from Patient Opinion, has the title "seriously let down" and awards one star out of five.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

The original plan behind all of this was to try and improve the quality of services. I don't think that's being achieved at the moment"

End Quote Gary Walker NHS whistleblower

The anonymous review, posted last year, reads: "I have been let down by the service at every opportunity, when I was at my most desperate."

The removal of the trust's reviews from NHS Choices comes as NHS England prepares to roll out its own patient feedback site, Care Connect.

The issue of potential system abuse is not unique to Nottinghamshire, but the trust was frequently flagged up during the Newsnight investigation.

Analysis of 7,333 reviews submitted to Patient Opinion last year found that 6% had been posted from computers connected to the NHS's "secure" computer network.

Reviews linked to NHS computer networks were critical of a trust or hospital in one in 10 cases, compared with one in four across all reviews.

Data released to Newsnight also showed that six of the most recent 100 reviews submitted to Care Connect originated from hospital computer networks.

Sixteen reviews posted to Care Connect from computers connected to the NHS network had an average score of 4.8 out of five stars, compared with the overall average of 3.7 out of five stars.

'Skewing results'

The NHS is currently piloting Care Connect across 18 healthcare trusts.

The system was due to be rolled out across the country by the end of the year, but the NHS has since dropped that ambition.

Care Connect will enable patients to submit reviews of care both online and by traditional means, and to leave a star-rating of hospitals against criteria such as "cleanliness" and "involvement in decision making".

Gary Walker, a former United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust chief executive, who became an NHS whistleblower, told Newsnight: "Your data has already shown that staff in the NHS are reporting data - that's wrong - and the data they're reporting is skewing the results and that has to be wrong, so it's making the data the public sees almost meaningless.

"The original plan behind all of this was to try and improve the quality of services. I don't think that's being achieved at the moment."

Patient Opinion already gives reviewers the option to indicate that they are NHS staff, a family member, carer, friend or volunteer but Care Connect does not.

'Leading the world'

Neil Churchill, director of patient experience for NHS England, told Newsnight that the "vast majority" of comments on Patient Opinion were coming from patients, carers or their families.

He said the NHS was "leading the world in the use of patient feedback".

"We can't guarantee that all reviews are coming from patients and families but we are very sure that the vast majority are," he insisted.

He said what happened in Nottinghamshire was a "very interesting experiment" to help "vulnerable patients to have a voice".

He added: "These reviews were coming from learning disabilities services, they were coming from secure hospitals, they were coming from older people in mental health wards and what staff were doing was writing up their feedback for them and posting them on Patient Opinion."

You can see more on this report on BBC Newsnight on Tuesday 18 March at 22:30 GMT on BBC Two, or later via the Newsnight website or BBC iPlayer.


21.24 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger